Gucci and Balenciaga aren’t the only ones going through changes. Right after Gucci’s announcement last week, news broke that Jonathan Anderson would be stepping down as creative director at Loewe. There has also been Simone Belloti’s appointment at Jil Sander, Glenn Martens at Margiela, and Michael Rider returned to Celine after Hedi Slimane’s exit late 2024. Soon we will become familiar with Versace sans Donatella, after Dario Vitale of Mui Miu was named as her successor.
Just three months into the year we’ve already seen various new collections from big-name designers making a debut at a new brand. They include Sarah Burton and Haider Ackerman at Tom Ford. Late last year, we saw Alessandro Michele’s Valentino debut and later this year we’re expecting Louise Trotter’s at Bottega Venetta.
But all these recent creative appointments reflect a continued trend of selecting predominantly white male designers, underscoring the industry's ongoing challenges with diversity and representation. Many are noticing. Last month, Vogue Business ran an article questioning the trend, stating that this “latest wave of creative director hires shows diversity remains on the back-burner, despite growing demand from luxury consumers for originality, storytelling, and connection”.
The writer noted only three female designers out of nine that were expected to debut new collections at a new maison in 2025. The number has now risen to include a person of colour — Haider Ackerman, who is Colombian. Of course, one must note Pharell Williams as the incumbent creative director for Louis Vuitton.
However, by pointing out storytelling, originality, and connection, the writer at Vogue Business precisely diagnoses the problem with such a small number of diverse appointments. The rapid HR changes demonstrate that the brands are aware that something needs to change, but somehow, it hasn’t occurred to the powers that be that perhaps more drastic changes are required.
That’s not to say the more than capable designers appointed to lead these brands cannot inject a new energy, or connect. But, in many ways, these are safe choices, and the lack of diversity means fashion may just continue on a path where it isn’t reflecting the consumer demand for new perspectives. In 2025, the resistance can be contextualised in a global culture that seems to be experiencing a reversal in gains where diversity is concerned.
Just a few days ago, the New York Times published a long list of words the DEI (diversity, equity and inclusion) averse Donald Trump administration has effectively banned from use in government communications.
“As President Trump seeks to purge the federal government of ‘woke’ initiatives, agencies have flagged hundreds of words to limit or avoid, according to a compilation of government documents,” the newspaper reported.
A few examples of those close to 200 words include, but are nowhere near limited to: antiracist, antiracism, bias, black, community equity, equity, equality, intersectionality, LGBTQ+, marginalised ... you get the picture. As you may be aware, right-wing political ideological movements — including AfriForum and Solidariteit in South Africa and the far right in Europe — are becoming increasingly louder, buoyed by Trump’s US election victory last year, Elon Musk’s insistence on using X as a personal platform to extol his virtues US government power broker. At the same time, US Vice-President JD Vance has also been urging the rejection of multiculturalism in Europe.
Yes, as I have argued, luxury fashion has never been a paragon of diversity, but the recent hiring development demonstrates a resistance to change that is reflected more broadly in society. While the brands are undoubtedly optimistic about the change their hiring practices might bring, just like economists are sounding the alarm on Donald Trump taking a wrecking ball to America’s economy and politics, and the potential disastrous consequences for the world, I’m willing to bet that fashion may, too, be on a fool’s errand.
Creative director musical chairs mirrors an unchanging world
Appointments at major luxury brands highlight a stubborn trend of selecting predominantly white male designers
“Big fashion is on a fool’s errand,” Enrique Menendez, global editor at Jing Daily, wrote recently. That follows what has become a season of new appointments and reshuffles as luxury behemoths experience a period of turbulence. As profits fall and consumer preferences change at an accelerated rate, brands have experienced a slew of short-lived designer tenures in a bid to arrest the fallout.
Gucci last week announced the appointment of Demna (Gvasalia) as artistic director. Demna — who only goes by the mononym — is the famed, at times controversial, maverick whose tenure saw significant transformation and revitalisation for Balenciaga. Kering, the parent company of both brands, is hoping Demna can do for Gucci what he achieved at Balenciaga.
Gucci reported a 12% drop in revenue in the 2024 fiscal year, and was projected to continue making losses in the first quarter of 2025. Demna succeeds Sabatto De Sarno, who presided over Gucci’s decline for only two years after taking over from Alessandro Michele in 2023.
Where are the women and people of colour in luxury fashion?
Gucci and Balenciaga aren’t the only ones going through changes. Right after Gucci’s announcement last week, news broke that Jonathan Anderson would be stepping down as creative director at Loewe. There has also been Simone Belloti’s appointment at Jil Sander, Glenn Martens at Margiela, and Michael Rider returned to Celine after Hedi Slimane’s exit late 2024. Soon we will become familiar with Versace sans Donatella, after Dario Vitale of Mui Miu was named as her successor.
Just three months into the year we’ve already seen various new collections from big-name designers making a debut at a new brand. They include Sarah Burton and Haider Ackerman at Tom Ford. Late last year, we saw Alessandro Michele’s Valentino debut and later this year we’re expecting Louise Trotter’s at Bottega Venetta.
But all these recent creative appointments reflect a continued trend of selecting predominantly white male designers, underscoring the industry's ongoing challenges with diversity and representation. Many are noticing. Last month, Vogue Business ran an article questioning the trend, stating that this “latest wave of creative director hires shows diversity remains on the back-burner, despite growing demand from luxury consumers for originality, storytelling, and connection”.
The writer noted only three female designers out of nine that were expected to debut new collections at a new maison in 2025. The number has now risen to include a person of colour — Haider Ackerman, who is Colombian. Of course, one must note Pharell Williams as the incumbent creative director for Louis Vuitton.
However, by pointing out storytelling, originality, and connection, the writer at Vogue Business precisely diagnoses the problem with such a small number of diverse appointments. The rapid HR changes demonstrate that the brands are aware that something needs to change, but somehow, it hasn’t occurred to the powers that be that perhaps more drastic changes are required.
That’s not to say the more than capable designers appointed to lead these brands cannot inject a new energy, or connect. But, in many ways, these are safe choices, and the lack of diversity means fashion may just continue on a path where it isn’t reflecting the consumer demand for new perspectives. In 2025, the resistance can be contextualised in a global culture that seems to be experiencing a reversal in gains where diversity is concerned.
Just a few days ago, the New York Times published a long list of words the DEI (diversity, equity and inclusion) averse Donald Trump administration has effectively banned from use in government communications.
“As President Trump seeks to purge the federal government of ‘woke’ initiatives, agencies have flagged hundreds of words to limit or avoid, according to a compilation of government documents,” the newspaper reported.
A few examples of those close to 200 words include, but are nowhere near limited to: antiracist, antiracism, bias, black, community equity, equity, equality, intersectionality, LGBTQ+, marginalised ... you get the picture. As you may be aware, right-wing political ideological movements — including AfriForum and Solidariteit in South Africa and the far right in Europe — are becoming increasingly louder, buoyed by Trump’s US election victory last year, Elon Musk’s insistence on using X as a personal platform to extol his virtues US government power broker. At the same time, US Vice-President JD Vance has also been urging the rejection of multiculturalism in Europe.
Yes, as I have argued, luxury fashion has never been a paragon of diversity, but the recent hiring development demonstrates a resistance to change that is reflected more broadly in society. While the brands are undoubtedly optimistic about the change their hiring practices might bring, just like economists are sounding the alarm on Donald Trump taking a wrecking ball to America’s economy and politics, and the potential disastrous consequences for the world, I’m willing to bet that fashion may, too, be on a fool’s errand.
You might also like....
Luxury fashion slowdown likely to continue into 2025
The ‘Black Dandy’ has a history in Africa, too
The steady transition from luxury to lifestyle